Reference AceGuides › What can a former employer legally say about you in NZ?

What can a former employer legally say about you in NZ?

The lines references cannot cross, and the ones they can.

The short version

The standard

Opinions in a reference should be honest, truthful and relevant to your work performance. That is the purpose of the exercise.

Off limits

Personal information without reason, defamatory statements, and discrimination on any Human Rights Act ground: gender, pregnancy, disability, ethnicity, age, political opinion, religious belief.

In practice

Most ex-employers confirm dates and title and give a guarded but fair view. A brief lifts guarded into specific, legally.

Where Reference Ace fits in

The honest version of this problem is solvable, and it lasts. No usable referee? We check real examples of your work, confirm they're yours, and vouch for them openly as an independent reviewer. Got referees? We brief them properly, run a practice of the exact call employers make, and use the consent rules that keep your current employer out of it until you have signed. Nothing to hide, nothing that unravels in year two.

Common questions

open> Can they mention why I left?

If asked directly, an honest, factual answer is allowed. The brief should agree on how it gets framed honestly.

> Can they say I was sacked?

If true and relevant, yes, though many will simply confirm dates and decline to elaborate, which is their right too.

> Can I see what they said?

You can ask your referee directly what they would say, and some employers share notes if asked. The Reference Ace practice check does exactly this, before it matters.

No referee? Show us your work

Reference Ace checks real examples of your work, confirms they're yours, and vouches for them to employers by name, always as an independent reviewer and never as a former boss. Got a referee already? We brief them and run the practice check before a real employer calls.

See how it works and pricing